Field sobriety tests play a key role in determining intoxication during DUI stops. These tests include actions like standing on one leg or walking in a straight line. But can you challenge their reliability? In Pennsylvania, it’s possible, and doing so may impact a DUI case.
Common issues with field sobriety tests
Field sobriety tests often rely on physical coordination. Factors such as medical conditions, physical disabilities, or even anxiety can affect a person’s performance. Poor road conditions, footwear, and even weather may also interfere with these tests. All these elements may make field sobriety tests less reliable as evidence in a DUI case.
Accuracy concerns
Field sobriety tests aren’t foolproof. Studies show they are not 100% accurate in determining whether someone is impaired. Officers must also follow specific procedures to administer these tests. If they fail to do so, the results may be questionable. For example, if an officer did not provide clear instructions, the test’s results may not hold up in court.
Challenging the results in court
To challenge field sobriety test results, an attorney may argue that the conditions were not ideal, or that the officer made errors during the administration of the test. Bringing in expert testimony or medical records that explain any physical limitations can strengthen this challenge. The goal is to show that the test results do not accurately reflect impairment.
Challenging field sobriety test reliability can weaken the prosecution’s case. If successful, it may lead to reduced charges or even a case dismissal. Understanding the flaws in these tests and presenting them effectively is crucial in defending against DUI allegations.